Study of Anode Shape Prediction in Through Mask Electrochemical Micro Machining

Vikram Singh; Pankaj jain; Dilip Gehlot

doi:https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V46P256

Research Article | Open Access | Download PDF

Volume 46 | Number 3 | Year 2017 | Article Id. IJETT-V46P256 | DOI : https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V46P256

Study of Anode Shape Prediction in Through Mask Electrochemical Micro Machining

Vikram Singh, Pankaj jain, Dilip Gehlot

Citation :

Vikram Singh, Pankaj jain, Dilip Gehlot, "Study of Anode Shape Prediction in Through Mask Electrochemical Micro Machining," International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT), vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 320-326, 2017. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V46P256

Abstract

Electrochemical micromachining (EMM) appears to be a promising technique, since in many areas of application, it offers several special advantages that include higher machining rate, better precision and control, and a wider range of materials that can be machined. Electrochemical machining for a hole is a complex phenomenon because it is involving two phase fluid dynamics, unsteady state heat transfer, electric field distribution, mass transfer, electrochemistry etc. between moving boundaries. Therefore Anode (work) shape prediction models are complicated. This paper is reviewed different model for analysis problem ie anode shape prediction. With finite element method, the anodic dissolution process is predicted.

Keywords

Electrochemical Machining Electrochemical micromachining, tool designing, anode shape prediction

References

[1] VK. Jain · Y. Kanetkar · G.K. Lal current attack and stagnation zones in electrochemical drilling © Springer- Verlag London Limited 2005
[2] Acharya BG, Jain VK, Batra JL (1986) Multi-objective optimization of the ECM process. Precis Eng 8:88–95
[3] Konig W, Pahl D (1970) Accuracy and optimal working conditions in ECM. Ann CIRP 18:223–230
[4] Tipton H (1971) Calculation of tool shape for ECM. In: Faust CL (ed) Fudamentals of ECM, pp 87–102
[5] Hopenfeld J, Cole RR (1966) ECM – prediction and correlation of process variables. Trans ASME J Eng Ind 88:1–7
[6] Jain VK (1980) An analysis of ECM process for anode shape prediction. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Roorkee
[7] Jain VK, Panday PC (1981) Tooling design for ECM – a finite element approach. J Eng Ind Trans ASME 103:183– 190
[8] Narayanan OH, Hinduja S, Noble CF (1986) The prediction of workpiece shape during ECM by boundary element method. Int J Mach Tool Des Res 26(3):323–338
[9] Eason, B. Noble, and I.N. Sneddon, ?On certain integrals of Lipschitz-Hankel type involving products of Bessel functions,? Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, vol. A247, pp. 529-551, April 1955. (references)
[10] Dr. V.K. Jain & K.P. Rajurkar ? An integrated approach for tool design in ECM? April 1991 Vol 13 No 2 Butterworth Heinemann
[11] Tipton, H. The Dynamics of Electrochemical Machining, Proc 5th Int Machine Tool Design and Research Cant, 1964, 509 522
[12] Konig W. et al Mathematical model for calculation of contour of the Anode in Electrochemical Machining, Ann CIRP, 25 1977, 83-87
[13] Tsuei, Yo G. et al Theoretical and Experimental Study of Workpiece Geometry in Electrochemical Machining, Trans ASME, 1977, 76-WA/Prod, I-5
[14] Narayanan, O. H., Hinduja, S. and Noble, C. F. The Prediction of Workpiece Shape during Electrochemical Machining by the Boundary Element Method, Int J Mach Tool Des Res, 26(3), 1986, 323-338
[15] Jain, V.K. (2005), ?Advanced Machining Processes, Allied Publishers, N. Delhi.
[16] Li Wang et.al, Finite element simulation and experimental study on the through-mask electrochemical micromachining (EMM) process Springer-Verlag London Limited 2010
[17] Zhu D et. al, Electrochemical micromachining of microstructures of micro hole and dimple array CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 58 (2009) 177–180
[18] Zhu D, Wang K, Yang J-M (2003) Design of Electrode Profile in Electrochemical Manufacturing Process. Annals of the CIRP 52/1:169–172.
[19] Jain VK, Pandey PC (1981) Tooling design for ECM—a finite element approach. J Eng Ind 103(5):183–191
[20] Matthias et al, ?Design of Electrochemical Machining Process by Multiphysics Simulation? COMSOL Multiphysics Conference. ol. III, G.T. Rado and H. Suhl, Eds. New York: Academic, 1963, pp. 271-350
[21] D. Landolt, P.-F. Chauvy, O. Zinger, ?Electrochemical micromachining, polishing and surface structuring of metals: fundamental aspects and new developments 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.doi:10.1016/S0013- 4686(03)00368-2